COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF ELECTRONIC RESOURCE USAGE STATISTICS ACCORDING TO COUNTER 5
https://doi.org/10.24108/2658-3143-2019-2-3-157-166
Abstract
About the Author
N. N. LitvinovaRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Expert, Letnikovskaya str., 4, bldg 5, off. 2.4, Moscow, 115114;
Chief Librarian, Vozdvizhenka str., 3/5, Moscow, 190019
References
1. Shepherd P.T. COUNTER: from conception to compliance. Learned Publishing. 2003;16(3):201–205. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315103322110996
2. Shepherd P.T. COUNTER: towards reliable vendor usage statistics. Vine. 2004;34(4):184–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055720410570975
3. Shepherd P.T. COUNTER 2005: a new Code of Practice and new applications of COUNTER usage statistics. Learned Publishing. 2005;18(4):287–293. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315105774648762
4. Pesch O. Ensuring consistent usage statistics, Part 1: Project COUNTER. The Serials Librarian. 2006;50(1–2):147–161. https://doi.org/10.1300/ J123v50n01_14
5. Kraemer A. Ensuring consistent usage statistics, part 2: working with use data for electronic journals. The Serials Librarian. 2006;50(1–2):163–172. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v50n01_15
6. Baker G., Read E.J. Vendor-supplied usage data for electronic resources: a survey of academic libraries. Learned Publishing. 2008;21(1):48–57. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315108X247276
7. Welker J. Counting on COUNTER: The Current State of E-Resource Usage Data in Libraries. Computers in Libraries. 2012;32(9):6–11.
8. Pesch O. COUNTER Release 5: What’s New and What It Means to Libraries. The Serials Librarian. 2017;73(3–4):195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/036 1526X.2017.1391153
9. Tenopir C., Christian L., Anderson R., Estelle L., Allard S., Nicholas D. Beyond the download: Issues in developing a secondary usage calculator. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries. 2017;5(2):365–377.
10. Estelle L. COUNTER: Release 5 of the Code of Practice. Performance Measurement and Metrics. 2017;18(3):180–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/pmm10-2017-0048
11. Osterman A., Estelle L., Pesch O. COUNTER: Consistency, Clarity, Simplification, and Continuous Maintenance. Purdue e-Pubs. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316678
12. Davis P.M., Price J.S. eJournal interface can influence usage statistics: implications for libraries, publishers, and Project COUNTER. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006;57(9):1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20405
13. Needham P., Stone G. IRUS-UK: making scholarly statistics count in UK repositories. Insight. 2012;25(3):262–266. https://doi.org/10.1629/2048- 7754.25.3.262
14. Litvinova N.N. Evolution of Concept of Library Collections under the Impact of Electronic Environment. Bibliotekovedenie. 2016;1(1):25–31 (In Russ.).
15. Litvinova N.N., Khakhaleva N.I. Registering of Electronic Network Remote Documents in Libraries. Bibliotekovedenie. 2014;1:35–41 (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Litvinova N.N. COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF ELECTRONIC RESOURCE USAGE STATISTICS ACCORDING TO COUNTER 5. Scholarly Research and Information. 2019;2(3):157-166. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24108/2658-3143-2019-2-3-157-166