Preview

Scholarly Research and Information

Advanced search

COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF ELECTRONIC RESOURCE USAGE STATISTICS ACCORDING TO COUNTER 5

https://doi.org/10.24108/2658-3143-2019-2-3-157-166

Abstract

The development of COUNTER usage statistics code of practice (de facto standard) during 2003–2016 is considered. It is demonstrated what issues in developing four successive versions of standard resulted in its substantial redesign fulfilled during 2016–2018 and implemented in COUNTER 5. New conceptual structure of COUNTER 5 (effective from January 1st, 2019) with its three components “objects — metrics — attributes” is described. New opportunities of statistical reports generation allowing to combine different attributes and metrics are analyzed. New standard reports are described and commented. Differences in summary statistics data compared to previous year data are explained. The importance of standardized usage data from content providers not COUNTER compliant yet is stressed.

About the Author

N. N. Litvinova
Non-profit Partnership “National Electronic Information Consortium” (NEICON) Russian State Library
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Expert, Letnikovskaya str., 4, bldg 5, off. 2.4, Moscow, 115114;

Chief Librarian, Vozdvizhenka str., 3/5, Moscow, 190019



References

1. Shepherd P.T. COUNTER: from conception to compliance. Learned Publishing. 2003;16(3):201–205. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315103322110996

2. Shepherd P.T. COUNTER: towards reliable vendor usage statistics. Vine. 2004;34(4):184–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055720410570975

3. Shepherd P.T. COUNTER 2005: a new Code of Practice and new applications of COUNTER usage statistics. Learned Publishing. 2005;18(4):287–293. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315105774648762

4. Pesch O. Ensuring consistent usage statistics, Part 1: Project COUNTER. The Serials Librarian. 2006;50(1–2):147–161. https://doi.org/10.1300/ J123v50n01_14

5. Kraemer A. Ensuring consistent usage statistics, part 2: working with use data for electronic journals. The Serials Librarian. 2006;50(1–2):163–172. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v50n01_15

6. Baker G., Read E.J. Vendor-supplied usage data for electronic resources: a survey of academic libraries. Learned Publishing. 2008;21(1):48–57. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315108X247276

7. Welker J. Counting on COUNTER: The Current State of E-Resource Usage Data in Libraries. Computers in Libraries. 2012;32(9):6–11.

8. Pesch O. COUNTER Release 5: What’s New and What It Means to Libraries. The Serials Librarian. 2017;73(3–4):195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/036 1526X.2017.1391153

9. Tenopir C., Christian L., Anderson R., Estelle L., Allard S., Nicholas D. Beyond the download: Issues in developing a secondary usage calculator. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries. 2017;5(2):365–377.

10. Estelle L. COUNTER: Release 5 of the Code of Practice. Performance Measurement and Metrics. 2017;18(3):180–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/pmm10-2017-0048

11. Osterman A., Estelle L., Pesch O. COUNTER: Consistency, Clarity, Simplification, and Continuous Maintenance. Purdue e-Pubs. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316678

12. Davis P.M., Price J.S. eJournal interface can influence usage statistics: implications for libraries, publishers, and Project COUNTER. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006;57(9):1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20405

13. Needham P., Stone G. IRUS-UK: making scholarly statistics count in UK repositories. Insight. 2012;25(3):262–266. https://doi.org/10.1629/2048- 7754.25.3.262

14. Litvinova N.N. Evolution of Concept of Library Collections under the Impact of Electronic Environment. Bibliotekovedenie. 2016;1(1):25–31 (In Russ.).

15. Litvinova N.N., Khakhaleva N.I. Registering of Electronic Network Remote Documents in Libraries. Bibliotekovedenie. 2014;1:35–41 (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Litvinova N.N. COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF ELECTRONIC RESOURCE USAGE STATISTICS ACCORDING TO COUNTER 5. Scholarly Research and Information. 2019;2(3):157-166. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24108/2658-3143-2019-2-3-157-166

Views: 4655


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-3143 (Online)