Expanding the Meaning of the Term “Document” as a Possible Factor of Reconsideration of the Objects of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics. 1. Towards the Evolution of the Concept of a Document
https://doi.org/10.24108/2658-3143-2020-3-2-3-104-130
Abstract
Introduction. In the context of methodological problems of bibliometrics, we consider the concept of the object of bibliometrics, viz. a document. In regard with the author’s view that the document is also an integral component of the objects of scientometrics and informetrics, the share of this component being very significant, it seems important to attempt to review some of the evolution that the concept of a “document” has undergone since the dictionary definition of 1975, as the perception of the document as the object of bibliometrics did not incorporate the changes that the concept of a document has undergone irrespectively of its application to “metric” research.
Materials and methods. Analytical interpretation of scientific literature, international and national standards, as well as dictionary articles related to this problem. Based on the above interpretation, an attempt to review the evolution of the term “document” has been made.
Results. The article traces some of the evolution of the concept of “document” since the dictionary definition of 1975 up to the definition of the international standard of 2017 and the paper by Yu. N. Stolyarov of 2018. Currently, any material object that can be used to obtain the information a person needs may be considered as a document.
Discussion and conclusion. This interpretation of the concept of a document, as well as a number of its predecessors, can be fruitful for a possible reconsideration of the concepts of the objects of bibliometrics, scientometrics and informetrics.
About the Author
V. S. LazarevBelarus
Vladimir S. Lazarev, leading bibliographer of the Department for Scientific Communications Development, Scientific Library
vslazarev@bntu.by
ResearcherID: D-5165-2016
Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.ru/citations?user=-C7EcR8AAAAJ&hl=ru&oi=sra
ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vladimir_Lazarev6
Nezalezhnosti ave., 65, Minsk, 220013, Republic of Belarus
References
1. Sviridova M.Yu. [Bibliometrics as one of the tools of science of science: the history of its development and formation] Bibliometriya kak odin iz instrumen-tov naukovedeniya: istoriya razvitiya i stanovleniya. Biblioteki vuzov Urala = Li-braries of the higher educational establishments of Ural. 2013;(12):14–24. (In Russ.)
2. Red'kina N.S. [Bibliometrics: history and modernity] Bibliometriya: is-toriya i sovremennost'. Molodye v bibliotechnom dele = Young in librarianship. 2003;(2):76–86. (In Russ.)
3. Chu H., Ke Q. Research methods: What's in the name? Library & Informa-tion Science Research. 2017;(39) 4: 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.11.001.
4. Lazarev V.S. [Bibliometrics] Bibliometriya In: Voprosy bibliografo-vedeniya i bibliotekovedeniya: Mezhvedomstvennyi sbornik, Minsk: Univer-sitetskoe Publ., 1991(12). (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309193751_Bibliometria_Bibliomentrics (assessed 18 September 2020).
5. Fokeev V. A., Mikheev G.V., ed. [Bibliographic science and practice: ter-minological dictionary] Bibliograficheskaya nauka i praktika: terminologicheskii slovar'. St. Petersburg: Professiya Publ., 2008. (In Russ.)
6. Gordukalova G.F. [Bibliometrics, scientometrics and webometric–starting with the number of rows in the works of Aristotle] Bibliometriya, naukometriya i vebometriya – ot chisla strok v rabotakh Aristotelya. Nauchnaya periodika: prob-lemy i resheniya = Scientific periodicals: problems and solutions. 2014;2(20): 40–46. (In Russ.)
7. Bonitz M. Scientometrie, Bibliometrie, Informetrie. Zentralblatt für Bib-liothekswesen. 1982; 92(1):19—23.
8. Stolyarov Yu.N. [Library: a structural and functional approach] Biblio-teka: strukturno-funktsional'nyi podkhod. Moscow: Kniga Publ., 1981. (In Russ)
9. [Otlet P.] Otle P. [A treatise on Documentation] Traktat o Dokumentatsii. In: [Otlet P.] Otle P. [Library, bibliography, documentation. Selected works of the information science pioneer] Biblioteka, bibliografiya, dokumentatsiya. Izbrannye trudy pionera informatiki. Gilyarevskii R.S., editor and translator. Moscow, FAIR-PRESS, Pashkov dom, 2004.(In Russ.)
10. Vaneev A.N. [Development of library science in the USSR] Razvitie bibliotekovedcheskoi mysli v SSSR. Moscow: Kniga Publ., 1980. (In Russ.)
11. Egghe L. Bridging the gaps – conceptual discussion on informetrics. Sci-entometrics. 1994;30(1): 35–47.
12. Prichard A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Docu-mentation. 1969; 25(4): 348-349.
13. Schmidmaier D. Application of bibliometries in technical university li-braries. In: Developing library effectiveness for next decade: Proceedings of the 7th Meeting IATUL, Leuven, 1977, 16–21 May. Göeteburg, 1978.
14. Voverene O. [Bibliometrics is a structural part of the methodology of im-formation science] Bibliometriya – strukturnaya chast' metodologii informatiki. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Ser. 1. = Scientific and technical infotmation, Ser. 1. 1985;(7):1–5. (in Russ.)
15. Marshakova-Shaikevich I.V. [The role of bibliometrics in evaluating re-search activity of science] Rol' bibliometrii v otsenke issledo-vatel'skoi aktivnosti nauki. In: [Management of large systems. Special issue 44 “Scientometrics and ex-pertise in the management of science”] Upravlenie bol'shimi sistemami. Spet-sial'nyi vypusk 44: «Naukometriya i ekspertiza v upravlenii naukoi». Moscow, 2013. (In Russ.)
16. Lazarev V.S. Notion of a document: a center of "gravity attraction" for getting metricians together. Scientometrics. 1994; 30(2–3): 511–516.
17. Gor'kova V.I. [Informetrics. Quantitative methods in scientific and techni-cal information] Informetriya (Kolichestvennye metody v nauchno-tekhnicheskoi informatsii). In: [Outcomes of science and technology. Ser. Information science]. Moscow, VINITI, 1988;10. (In Russ.)
18. Brookes B.C. Comments on the scope of bibliometrics. In: Egghe L., Rousseau R. (Eds). Informetrics 87/88: Proceedings of the First International Con-ference on Bibliometrics and Theoretical Aspects of Information Retrieval, Diepenbeek, Belgium, 25-28 August 1987, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amster-dam – New York – Oxford – Tokyo, 1980.
19. Dadalko V.A., Dadalko S.V. [Metrical research as a form of analysis of scientific productivity] Metricheskie issledovaniya kak forma analiza nauchnoi produktivnosti. Znanie. Understanding. Skill. = Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2019;(2): 125–136. (In Russ.)
20. Wormell I. Informetrics: an emerging subdiscipline in information sci-ence. Asian Libraries. 1998;7(10): 257–268.
21. Pen'kova O.V., Tyutyunnik V.M. [Informetrics, scientometrics and bib-liometrics: scientometric analysis of the present state of things] Informetriya, naukometriya i bibliometriya: naukometricheskii analiz sovremennogo sostoy-aniya. Vestnik Tambovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki = Tambov University Reports. Series Natural and Technical Sciences. 2001;6(1): 86–88. (In Russ.)
22. Sokolov A.V. [Determinism and deontology in the document communi-cation system (problem statement)] Determinizm i deontologiya v dokumentnoi kommunikatsionnoi sisteme (postanovka problemy). Vestnik Chelyabinskoi gosu-darstvennoi akademii kul'tury i iskusstv = Herald of the Chelyabinsk State Acad-emy of Culture and Arts. 2008; (4 (16)): 6–33. (In Russ.)
23. Glänzel, W., Schoepflin, U. Little scientometrics, big scientometrics ... and beyond? Scientometrics. 1994;30(2—3): 375–384.
24. [Dictionary of Informatics Terms] Terminologicheskii slovar' po infor-matike. Moscow, International Center for Scientific and Technical Information. 1975. (In Russ.)
25. Almind T.C., Ingwersen P. Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’. Journal of Documentation, (1997); 53(4): 404–426. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007205
26. Sokolov A.V. [Epistemology of the document (Methodological essay)] Epistemologiya dokumenta (Metodologicheskii ocherk). Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Ser. 2. = Scientific and Technical Information. Ser. 2. 2009;(3):1–12. (In Russ.)
27. Shvetsova-Vodka G.N. [General theory of documents and books: Text-book] Obshchaya teoriya dokumenta i knigi: Uchebnoe posobie. Moscow, Rybari; Kiev, Znaniya Publ., 2009. (In Russ.)
28. Stolyarov Yu.N. [Formation of the library stock: a practical guide] For-mirovanie bibliotechnogo fonda: prakticheskoe posobie. St.-Petersburg, Professiya Publ., 2015. (In Russ.)
29. Lar'kov N.S. [Documentology: Textbook. 3rd ed, revised and enhanced] Dokumentovedenie : uchebnik. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2017. (In Russ.)
30. Stolyarov Yu.N. [Oral document] Ustnyi document. Ukraïn'skii zhurnal z bibliotekoznavstva ta informatsiinikh nauk = Ukrainian journal of library science and information science. 2018;(2): 24–36. (In Russ.)
31. Sokolov A.V. [General theory of social communication: Textbook] Obshchaya teoriya sotsial'noi kommunikatsii: Uchebnoe posobie. St.-Petersburg, Mikhailov V.A. Publ, 2002. (In Russ.)
32. Records management and organization of archives: Terms and definitions. GOST of the Republic of Belarus 16487-83. – Re-release (January 2009). Minsk, Gosstandart Publ., 2009. (In Russ.)
33. Stolyarov Yu. N. [The theory of relativity of the document] Teoriya ot-nositel'nosti dokumenta. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki = Scientific and tech-nical libraries. 2006;(7): 73–78. (In Russ.)
34. Zinov'eva N.B. [Information culture of the individual: Introduction to the course. Textbook]. Informatsionnaya kul'tura lichnosti: Vvedenie v kurs. Uchebnoe posobie. Krasnodar, 1996. Cited according to: Morgenstern I.G. [Document: information and / or carrier?] Dokument: informatsiya i/ili nositel'? Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki = Scientific and technical libraries, 2003;(1): 123–127. (In Russ.)
35. Grikhanov Yu.A., Stolyarov Yu.N. [Document] Dokument. In: [Grik-hanov Yu.A., Editor-in-Chief. Library encyclopedia] Grikhanov Yu.A., gl. red. Bibliotechnaya entsiklopediya. Moscow: Pashkov dom Publ., 2007. (In Russ.)
36. Gilyarevskii P.C. [Information sphere: a concise encyclopedia] Informat-sionnaya sfera: kratkii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. St.-Petersburg, Professiya Publ., 2016. (In Russ.)
37. Records management and organization of archives: Terms and definitions. STB (State Standard of the Republic of Belarus) 2059-2013. Minsk, Gosstandart Publ., 2013. (In Russ.)
38. Records management and organization of archives: Terms and defini-tions. GOST R 7.8-2013 (National Standard of the Russian Federation) Available at: https://dokipedia.ru/document/5312378 (accessed 23.07.2020). (In Russ.)
39. Publications: main types. Terms and definitions. DSTU (State Standard of the Ukraine) 3017-95. Cited according to Tyurikova N.A. [Specific features of representation of terminology of the subject area “Record management and archi-val business” in lexicographic sources] Osobennosti predstavleniya terminologii predmetnoi oblasti «Deloproizvodstvo i arkhivnoe delo» v leksikograficheskikh is-tochnikakh. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 2: Ya-zykoznanie = Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics. 2016; (1(30)): 87–95. (In Russ.)
40. Records management and organization of archives. Terms and defini-tions. DSTU (State Standard of the Ukraine) 2732-2004. Cited according to: Tyu-rikova N.A. [Specific features of representation of terminology of the subject area “Record management and archival business” in lexicographic sources] Osoben-nosti predstavleniya terminologii predmetnoi oblasti «Deloproizvodstvo i arkhiv-noe delo» v leksikograficheskikh is-tochnikakh. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosu-darstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 2: Yazykoznanie = Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics. 2016; (1(30)): 87–95. (In Russ.)
41. Stolyarov Yu.N. [Document: invariant and variable components of the definition] Dokument: invariantnaya i variativnaya komponenta definitsii. Nauch-nye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki. = Scientific and technical libraries. 2010;(11): 25–33. (In Russ.)
42. [Grikhanov Yu.A., Editor-in-Chief. Library encyclopedia] Grikhanov Yu.A., gl. red. Bibliotechnaya entsiklopediya. Moscow: Pashkov dom Publ., 2007. (In Russ.)
43. [Requirements of the State standard of the Republic of Belarus STB 6.38-2004 on record management] Trebovaniya Gosudarstvennogo standarta Respubliki Belarus' STB 6.38-2004 po deloproizvodstvu (E-resourse) Available at: http://www.rabotni-ka.narod.ru/IndS20.html (accessed 24.07.2020).
44. Moiseenko O. [Office management: understanding the terms] Deloproiz-vodstvo: razbiraemsya v terminakh. Sekretarskoe delo = Secretarial business. 2012;(9). ([“Register” information and legal agency] Informatsionno-pravovoe agentstvo «Registr»: E-resource) Available at: https://profmedia.by/pub/sec/art/69961/ (accessed 24.07.2020).
45. Pleshkevich E. A. [Fundamentals of the general theory of documents] Osnovy obshei teorii dokumenta. Saratov, 2005. Cited according to: Sokolov A.V. [Epistemology of the document (Methodological essay)] Epistemologiya do-kumenta (Metodologicheskii ocherk). Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Ser. 2. = Scientific and Technical Information. Ser. 2. 2009;(3):1–12. (In Russ.)
46. Quality management system. Basic provisions and vocabulary. STB ISO 9000-2015 (ISO 9000:2015,IDT). — Instead of STB ISO 9000-2006; introduced 2016-03-01. Minsk, Gosstandart Publ. et al., 2015 (In Russ.).
47. Quality management system. Basic provisions and vocabulary (Amended) GOST R ISO 9000-2015 (National Standard of the Russian Federa-tion) (In Russ.). Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200124393 (accessed 28.07. 2020).
48. Shvetsova-Vodka G.N. [Towards the discussion about the definition of the documents] K diskussii ob opredelenii dokumenta. Scientific and technical in-formation. Ser. 1. = Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Ser. 1. 2007;(8): 1–6. (In Russ.).
49. ISO 9000:2015(en) Quality management systems — Fundamentals and vocabulary // ISO Online Browsing Platform (OBP) – Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9000:ed-4:v1:en (accessed 28.07.2020).
50. Sokolov A.V. On the ways of cognition of the document sphere. Part 2. Scientific and technical libraries = Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki. 2016;(6):3–22. (In Russ.).
51. Ursul A.D. [Information: methodological aspects] Informatsiya: me-todologicheskie aspekty. Moscow, 1971. (in Russ.)
52. Sokolov A.V. [Information science opuses. Opus 1. Wandering in the wilds of informatization] Scientific and technical libraries = Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki.2010;(8):5–26. (in Russ.)
53. Vorob'ev G.G. [Information theory of the document: Synopsys of the Doctoral Dissertation (Technical Sciences)] Informatsionnaya teoriya dokumenta: avtoref. dis. ... d-ra tekh. nauk. Moscow, 1979. Cited according to: Sokolov A.V. On the ways of cognition of the document sphere. Part 2. Scientific and technical libraries = Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki. 2016;(6):3-22. (In Russ.).
54. [Author] Avtor. In: [Ushakov's explanatory dictionary] Tolkovyi slovar' Ushakova. In: [Dictionaries and encyclopedias on the Academician] Slovari i ent-siklopedii na Akademike (E-resource). Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ushakov/737294#sel=5:1,5:1n (accessed 28.07.2020). (In Russ.).
55. [Author] Avtor. In: [Brockhaus and Efron encyclopedia] Entsiklopediya Brokgauza i Efrona In: [Dictionaries and encyclopedias on the Academician] Slo-vari i entsiklopedii na Akademike (E-resource). Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/brokgauz/3750 (accessed 28.07.2020). (In Russ.).
56. [Installation (art). Material from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.] Installyatsiya (iskusstvo). Material iz Vikipedii – svobodnoi entsiklopedii. (E-resource) Available at: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BB%D1%8F%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_(%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA%D1%83%D1%81%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE) (accessed 28.07.2020). (In Russ.).
57. [Communication process] Kommunikatsionnyi protsess. In: Psyera-ᴪ: Psychological community. (E-resource) Available at: https://psyera.ru/4825/kommunikacionnyy-process (accessed 16.08.2020). (In Russ.).
58. Shvetsova-Vodka G.N. [Defining the object and subject of documentology] Opredelenie ob’ekta i predmeta dokumentovedeniya. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki = Scientific and technical libraries. 2008;(4): 30–44. (In Russ.).
59. Nedoseka V.O., Kandalov V.I. [The essence and content of the communication process] Sushchnost' i soderzhanie kommunikatsionnogo protsessa. In: [Russia and the world: the development of civilizations. transformation of political landscapes for the period 1999-2019. Proceedings of the IXth international scientific and practical conference: in 2 parts.] Rossiya i mir: razvitie tsivilizatsii. transformatsiya politicheskikh landshaftov za period 1999-2019 gody: Materialy IX mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii: v 2-kh chastyakh. Mosciw: Institute of world civilizations, 2019. (In Russ.)
60. System of standards on information, librarianship and publishing. In-formation and librarian activity, bibliography.Terms and definitions. GOST 7.0-99. (Interstate standard.) (In. Russ.) Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/gost-7-0-99 (accessed 29.07.2020).
61. System of standards on information, librarianship and publishing. In-formation and librarian activity, bibliography.Terms and definitions. STB GOST 7.0-2004. Minsk, Gosstandart Publ. et al., 2004 (In Russ.).
62. Peregudov F.I., Tarasenko F. P. [Introduction to system analysis] Vvedenie v sistemnyi analiz. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1989. (In Russ.).
63. ISO 5127:2017(en) Information and documentation — Foundation and vocabulary. In: ISO Online Browsing Platform (OBP). Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:5127:ed-2:v1:en (accessed 29.07.2020).
64. Sokolov A.V. [Introduction to the theory of social communication: Textbook for University students who study in the specialty of “Culturology”] Vvedenie v teoriyu sotsial'noi kommunikatsii: Uchebn posobie dlya studentov vysshikh uchebykh zavedenii, obuchayushchikhsya, obuchayushchikhsya po spetsial'nosti “Kul'turologiya”. St. Petersburg., 1996. (In Russ.)
65. Stolyarov Yu. N. [Document: both information and media] Dokument: i informatsiya, i nositel’. Scientific and technical libraries = Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki, 2003;(2): 128–129. (In Russ.)
66. Nalimov V.V. [Scattering my thoughts. On the road and at the crossroad] Razbrasyvayu mysli. V puti i na pereput'e. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2000. (In Russ.)
67. Lazarev V. S. [On the relationship of information and document in the context of the New Testament] O vzaimosvyazi informatsii i dokumenta v kontekste Novogo Zaveta. In: [IVth International Cyril and Methodius readings dedicated to the days of Slavic writing and culture. Materials of Readings (Minsk, May 24-26, 1998). In 2 parts. Part 1] IV Mezhdunarodnye Kirillo-Mefodievskie chteniya, posvyashchennye Dnyam slavyanskoi pis'mennosti i kul'tury: Materialy chtenii (Minsk, 24-26 maya 1998 g.). V 2 chastyakh. Chast’ 1. Minsk, 1999. (In Russ.)
68. Semenkover B. A. [The evolution of information activities before print-ing] Evolyutsiya informatsionnoi deyatel'nosti do knigopechataniya. Moscow: Pashkov dom, 2017. Cited according to: Stolyarov Yu.N. [Oral document] Ustnyi document. Ukraïn'skii zhurnal z bibliotekoznavstva ta informatsiinikh nauk = Ukrainian journal of library science and information science. 2018;(2): 24–36. (In Russ.)
69. Sukhorukov K.M. [Book in the future (foreign estimates, trends, fore-casts)] Kniga v budushchem (zarubezhnye otsenki, tendentsii, prognozy) In: [Book. Research and materials] Kniga. Issledovaniya i materialy. – Moscow: Terra Publ, 1993. Cited according to: Stolyarov Yu.N. [Oral document] Ustnyi docu-ment. Ukraïn'skii zhurnal z bibliotekoznavstva ta informatsiinikh nauk = Ukrain-ian journal of library science and information science. 2018;(2): 24–36. (In Russ.)
70. Stolyarov Yu.N. The Contribution of G. N. Shvetsova-Vodka to documentology. On the 75th anniversary of her birth. Scientific and technical libraries = Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki, 2018;(11): 78–89. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Lazarev V.S. Expanding the Meaning of the Term “Document” as a Possible Factor of Reconsideration of the Objects of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics. 1. Towards the Evolution of the Concept of a Document. Scholarly Research and Information. 2020;3(2-3):104-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24108/2658-3143-2020-3-2-3-104-130