Attitude to Open Access in Russian Scholarly Community 2020: Two Years Later

Introduction. The work analyses chenges in the attitude to Open Access of the Russian scholarly community in 2018–2020.

Materials and methods. This study employs online survey methodology with quantitative analysis of results. Materials used are raw data of the survey among 828 respondents in 187 organizations conducted in July 2020 and resuts of the previus survey in 2018.

Results. Comparison of two surveys indicates notable growth of awareness, positive attitude and readiness for self-archiving in institutional repositories. Since 2018, the relative share of Russian authors published in OA has grown and reached 89 %. Four different professional groups show similar results for different models of OA publishing. The share of Russian institutions with repositories increased from 46 to 55 %, however still falls behind the values reported for European countries. Three quarters of respondents support mandatory OA publishing of research with state funding. 81 % consider that state policy of Open Access to scholarly publications has to be developed in Russia.

Discussion and conclusions. Results obtained in this work confirm strong support of the OA initiative by all proffecional groups of Russian academic community together with successfull experience of Russian researchers in OA publishing either in Gold OA or Green OA. In 2020, level of OA awareness of Russian researchers and research leaders exceeds the 2017 and 2019 indicators of European and American universities. In general, results in Russia fit recent results of national and international surveys.

1. Razumova I. K., Litvinova N. N., Shvartsman M. E., Kuznetsov A. Yu. Аttitude to open access in Russian scholarly community: 2018. survey results and analysis. Scholarly Research and Information. 2018;1(1):6-21. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24108/2658-3143-2018-1-1-6-21

2. Swan A., Brown S. Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing. 2004;17(3):219-224. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315104323159649

3. Suber P. Open Access Overview. Focusing on open access to peer-reviewed research articles and their preprints. URL: https://legacy.earlham.edu/~-peters/fos/overview.htm (accessed 12 November 2020).

4. Suber P. Open access overview. 2006. Available at: http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm

5. Swan A. Policy guidelines for the development and promotion of open access. UNESCO. 2012. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000215863.

6. Crawford W. Gold Open Access 2013–2018: Articles in journals (GOA4). Livermore, CA.: Cites & Insights Books. 2019. URL: https://waltcrawford.name/goa4.pdf

7. Coalition S. Plan S: Making full and immediate Open Access a reality. Available at: https://www.coalition-s.org

8. Analytical support for bibliometrics indicators. Open access availability of scientific publications. Final report. 2018. Science-Metrix Inc. URL: https://www.science-metrix.com/sites/default/files/science-metrix/publications/science-metrix_open_access_availability_scientific_publications_report.pdf

9. Piwowar H., Priem J., Larivière V., Alperin J. P., Matthias L., Norlander B., et al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. Peer J. 2018;6:e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375. Russian version: Piwowar H., Priem J., Larivière V., Alperin J. P., Matthias L., Norlander B. et. al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. Scholarly Research and Information. 2019;2(4):228-247. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24108/2658-3143-2019-2-4-228-247

10. Piwowar H., Priem J., Orr R. The Future of OA: A large-scale analysis projecting Open Access publication and readership. bioRxiv. 2019:795310. https://doi.org/10.1101/795310

11. Razumova I. K. COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact on Bibliometrics and Use. Part I. Numbers and Structure of Publication Datasets. Scholarly Research and Information. 2020;3(2-3):166-187. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24108/2658-3143-2020-3-2-3-166-187

12. Swan A., Brown Sh. Swan, Alma and Brown Sheridan Open access self-archiving: An author study s.n. 2005 URL: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/260999/

13. Swan A. The culture of open access: Researchers’ views and responses. In: Jacobs N. (ed.). Open access: Key strategic. Chandos: Technical and Economic Aspects; 2006. URL: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/262428 (accessed 12 November 2020).

14. Kim J. Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2011;37(3):246-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.017

15. Xia J. F. Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Across disciplines. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2007;33(6):647-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.09.020

16. Xia J. F., Sun L. Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Depositorship and fulltext availability. Serials Review. 2007;33(1):14-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2007.10765087

17. Kim J. Motivating and impeding factors affecting faculty contribution to institutional repositories. Journal of Digital Information. 2007;8(2). URL: https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/193/177 (accessed 12 November 2020).

18. Hendler J. Reinventing academic publishing. Part 1. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2007;22(5):2-3. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.4338485

19. Creaser C. Open access research outputs — Institutional policies and researchers’ views: results form two complementary surveys. New Review of Academic Librarianship. 2010;16(1):4-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614530903162854

20. Rodriguez J. E. Awareness and attitudes about open access publishing: a glance at generational differences. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2014;40:604-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.013

21. Spezi V., Fry J., Creaser C., Proberts S., White S. Researchers’ green open access practice: a crossdisciplinary analysis. Journal of Documentation. 2013;69(3):334-359. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2012-0008

22. Greyson D., Vézina K., Morrison H., Taylor D., Black C. University supports for open access: A Canadian National Survey. Canadian Journal of Higher Education. 2009;39(3):1-32.

23. Boufarss M., Laakso M. Open Sesame? Open access priorities, incentives, and policies among higher education institutions in the United Arab Emirates. Scientometrics. 2020;124:1553-1577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03529-y

24. Boock M., Todorova T. Y., Trencheva T. S., Todorova R. Bulgarian authors open access awareness and preferences. Library Management. 2020;41(2-3)91-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-08-2019-0059

25. Fitzgerald S. R., Jiang Z. Scholarly Publishing at a Crossroads: Scholarly Perspectives on Open Access. Innov High Educ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09508-8

26. Morais R., Borrell-Damian L. EUA Open Access Survey Report 2016–2017. February 2018. https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/open%20access%202016-2017%20eua%20survey%20results.pdf. (accessed 12 November 2020).

27. Morais R., Borrell-Damián L. Open access: 2017–2018 EUA survey results. URL: https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/2017-2018%20open%20access%20survey%20results.pdf (accessed 12 November 2020).

28. Yimei Zhu. Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics’ OA practice. Scientometrics. 2017;111(2):557-579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2316-z

29. Dallmeier-Tiessen S., Darby R., Goerner B., Hyppoelae J., Igo-Kemenes P., Kahn D., et al. Highlights from the SOAP project survey. What scientists think about Open Access publishing (p. arXiv:1101.5260). 2011. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1101.5260.pdf

30. Boukacem-Zeghmouri Ch., Dillaerts H., Lafouge Th., Bador P., Sauer-Avargues A. French publishing attitudes in the open access era: The case of mathematics, biology, and computer science. Learned Publishing. 2018;31:345-354. http://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1169

31. Razumova I. K. How and where researcher can publish: ABC of OA 20 years after (In Russ.). Available at: https://conf.neicon.rumaterials/79-online1020/20201022-Razumova.pdf (accessed 05 November 2020).